United States Flag
Official Website of the Department of Homeland Security

ICE announces Wake County criminal offenders shielded by current non-cooperation policy

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has repeatedly asked local jurisdictions to reconsider non-cooperation policies because those policies put politics before public safety. On Friday, ICE released more examples of foreign nationals with active ICE detainers who have been detained for serious criminal offenses in North Carolina’s Wake County. ICE asks Wake County to transfer these individuals to federal custody instead of releasing them to the community where they may reoffend.

ICE maintains that cooperation with local law enforcement is essential to protecting public safety, and the agency aims to work cooperatively with local jurisdictions to ensure that criminal aliens are not released into U.S. communities to commit additional crimes.

“The only way a person is subject to an ICE detainer in Wake County is if they are handcuffed and arrested for a crime committed in the local community,” said acting ICE Director Matt Albence. “These misguided policies protect criminals, not the immigrant communities they were created to protect.”

Detainers Currently Outstanding

North Carolina

Includes Buncombe, Durham, Forsyth, Guilford, Mecklenburg and Wake counties.

Attempted robbery with dangerous weapon; breaking and entering; larceny; possess marijuana; possess drug paraphernalia Alan Miguel Ruiz Read More Trafficking in cocaine; continuing criminal enterprise David Anaya Gutierrez Read More Indecent liberties with a child Cristhian Javier Villaquiran Marquez Read More Indecent liberties with a child; sexual battery; statutory sex offense by an adult Adrian Alvarez Portugez Read More Murder Efren Ernesto Caballero Read More Murder Adrian Alvarez Portugez Eliseo Gonzalez Murder Jose Brayan Guzman Read More indecent liberties with children Erick Xavier Calix Banegas Read More 1st degree sex offense by force; false imprisonment Albert Appiah Read More Drug trafficking; resisting arrest; possess drug paraphernalia; possess methamphetamine Angel Vagas Ventura Read More assault on female; larceny; possess marijuana; failure to appear on charges of DWI and assault Juan Manuel Dejesus Camargo Read More Trafficking cocaine; possess drug paraphernalia; possess cocaine Rosendo Martinez Garcia Read More 3 counts Indecent liberties with child; 2 counts statutory sex offense with child by adult Ricardo Luis Mata Borjas Read More 3 counts Indecent liberties with child; 2 counts sexual act by sub/parent custodian; 2 counts statutory sex offense with child by adult Francisco Javier Diaz Rodriguez Read More 3 counts Indecent liberties with child; 2 counts statutory sex offense with child; statutory rape of child (under 15) Rigoberto Murcia Martinez Read More 5 counts indecent liberties with child; 3 counts statutory sex offense with child by adult; statutory rape of child by adult Alejandro Gomez Cervantes Read More Indecent liberties with child; Statutory rape of a child (under 15); contributing to delinquency of a minor Jose Maynor Cruz Sorto Read More trafficking opium or heroin; sell heroin; maintaining vehicle, dwelling, place controlled substance Jose Martinez Martinez Read More 1st degree murder Ennio Santos Solorzano Read More 3 counts trafficking opium or heroin; 2 counts maintaining vehicle, dwelling, place controlled substance; 2 counts sell/deliver heroin; possess stolen firearm Jasmine Rodriguez Villareal Read More 1st degree; 2 counts assault with a deadly weapon; Consipre robbery dangerous weapon; 3 counts robbery with dangerous weapon Carlos Fernandez Rosales Read More 1st degree rape of a child; Indecent liberties with a child Kirk Walter Nunez-Serraios Read More Statutory rape of a child under 15 and stalking Gustavo Lopez Villalazo Read More Indecent liberties with a child; Attempted 2nd degree forcible rape; 2nd degree forcible rape Miguel Angel Tapia Martinez Read More Trafficking Cocaine Sergio Neftali Viveros-Rodriguez Read More

When law enforcement agencies fail to honor immigration detainers and release serious criminal offenders onto the streets, it undermines ICE’s ability to protect public safety and carry out its mission. As ICE has repeatedly made clear, when local jurisdictions refuse to cooperate with federal law enforcement, they not only betray their duty to protect public safety, but force ICE to be more visible in those areas.

“It is past time to put aside all the political rhetoric and listen to the facts – and the fact is, people are being hurt and victimized every day because of jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate with ICE,” said Albence.

While making clear the consequences of uncooperative jurisdictions, Albence also commended law enforcement partners who do work with ICE because it is much safer for all involved if ICE officers take custody of at-large fugitives in the controlled environment of another law enforcement agency. Approximately 70 percent of ICE arrests happen after ICE is notified that an alien is being released from local jails or state prisons. In fiscal year 2019, ICE lodged more than 160,000 detainers with local law enforcement agencies.

Acting Director Albence reiterated that ICE is mandated to uphold the federal immigration laws enacted by Congress, and that the agency will carry out its sworn mission, with or without the cooperation of local law enforcement agencies.

“It is my sincere desire to work with local partners to whatever extent they are willing to work with this agency in what should be our shared goal to ensure public safety,” he said. “Uncooperative jurisdictions such as Wake County should be on notice that as long as criminal offenders are being released, they should get used to seeing a lot more ICE at-large enforcement activity in their communities.”

Nationally, approximately 90 percent of all people arrested by ICE during fiscal year 2019 either had a criminal conviction, a pending criminal charge, had illegally re-entered the United States after being previously removed (a federal felony), or were an immigration fugitive subject to a final order of removal.

Specific to the Raleigh-Durham area, in fiscal year 2017, 691 criminal aliens were transferred into ICE custody pursuant to an immigration detainer. In 2018, since the enactment of Wake’s non-cooperation policy these individuals are instead released into the community where they are free to reoffend until ICE is able to locate and arrest them, or until they commit additional preventable crimes in the community resulting in their arrest again by other law enforcement.

Despite the challenges this policy creates, ICE remains committed to enforcing federal law, and residents should continue to expect a more visible ICE presence in Raleigh while this non-cooperation policy remains in effect, as ICE has no choice but to conduct more at-large arrests in local neighborhoods and at worksites, which will inevitably result in additional collateral arrests instead of arrests at the jail where enforcement is safer for everyone involved.

Previous Releases

ICE announces more Mecklenburg County criminal offenders shielded by current non-cooperation policy

On October 25,  2019, ICE released additional information on more unlawfully present foreign nationals facing serious criminal offenses in Mecklenburg County, who under the county’s ICE non-cooperation policy would currently be released back into the local community where they would be free to reoffend. Read more →

About Detainers

Detainers serve as a legally authorized request, upon which a law enforcement agency may rely, to continue to maintain custody of an alien for up to 48 hours so that ICE may assume custody for removal purposes. Pursuant to ICE policy, all ICE detainers are submitted with an accompanying administrative arrest warrant or warrant of removal depending upon the circumstances of the individual case. ICE places immigration detainers when the agency possesses probable cause to believe an alien is deportable from the United States.

When law enforcement agencies fail to honor immigration detainers and release a criminal alien onto the streets, it negatively impacts public safety.

Sanctuary Policies Put Public Safety at Risk

  • Sanctuary policies leave ICE with no choice but to increase enforcement in neighborhoods and workplaces to locate and arrest these persons while they are at-large – increasing the likelihood that other individuals previously not targeted for arrest will be taken into ICE custody.
  • It is safer for everyone if ICE takes custody of an alien in the controlled environment of another law enforcement agency as opposed to visiting an alien’s residence, place of work, or other public area. Arresting a criminal in the safety, security, and privacy of a jail is always the best option.
  • When law enforcement agencies don’t honor ICE detainers, these individuals, who often have significant criminal histories, are released onto the street, presenting a potential public safety threat. When ICE Fugitive Operations officers have to go out into the community to proactively locate these criminal aliens, regardless of the precautions they take, it needlessly puts our personnel and potentially innocent bystanders in harm’s way.
Last Reviewed/Updated: 11/14/2019
Scroll To Top